From "The blogs, conspiracy theorists and Bush - that's all the worst of 2006" by Bernard-Henri Lévy, the Corriere paper today
E 'was the year when it was confirmed that the misinformation is no longer true in the absence or the lack of information, or even in the complaint but on the contrary, in the flood, the steady stream of news and comments [.. .]
E 'was the year of the blog, in fact, that navel-gazing for a planetarium.
Dear Professor Levy has taken a beautiful crab. She confuses cause and effect: he believes that the information has become disiformazione since the interconnections are given access to all the "continuous flow of information" that both horrifies.
I do not have titles, nor its merits, I was born nearly two decades after her. But I have one thing clear before our eyes, now that I have access to almost everything that is said about a certain topic. The information is already born polluted, limping, contradictory. Receiving a few copies, chopped apart in time, there seems to be consistent. But to read, hear and see everything that is said even by so-called "media" on one specific fact, we can see obvious errors, inconsistencies, interpretations, crippling.
Try to take in half the blogs on the issue of (mis) information - which is essentially the problem of being a human activity, and therefore fallible - just turn your back, make excuses. Accuse those who have gone beyond reading newspapers, as well as deepening, in the view to sharing network to be turned in upon themselves is a futile excuse that we would never read by those who have spent a lifetime (dis) information where the information was a scarce and valuable .
0 comments:
Post a Comment